Progressive Calculus, Daily Kos Mandates & Comeuppance 101

Let’s all take another swift plunge into the rhetorical abyss of liberal hypocrisy. In a lukewarm effort to justify Obama’s inflexibility on tax rates, Daily Kos revs up the noise machines to insist the president now yields an indisputable mandate. Adding untold insult to injury, their contentions are solely supported by shamelessly invoking — wait for it — the same Bush mandate they repeatedly rejected with resounding fervor. While few will be surprised, let’s all momentarily pause for a collective eye-roll nonetheless. Without further adieu, feel free to join alongside my swan dive into the following dangerously shallow cesspool of sophistry:

Obama will not compromise. And why should he? He just won an election. He won 332 vs 206 of the electoral votes. He got 51% vs 47% of the national votes. 4 million more votes than Romney. He fared much better than Bush who beat Kerry by 286 to 251 electoral votes in 2004, a much smaller margin, with 51% to 48% of the national vote, also a smaller margin, and Bush claimed to have a “mandate” in 2004. If Bush had a mandate, Obama sure as hell has one now.

Well the tides certainly have turned, haven’t they? Exploring the mandate issue will require quickly rewinding to November of 2004. Against all odds, Bush 43 inexplicably secured a second term by narrowly winning 51% of the popular vote in, what some consider, his only electoral victory not achieved by a Supreme Court ruling. The response of the left — particularly progressives — rest assured, was both swift and resolute. In fact, Democrats of every shade staunchly declared, in unshakable lockstep, that a slim voter margin of 51% did not yield Bush a mandate. For the record, I agree with them as much now as I did then. What remains worthier of noting, however, is that precious few were more outspoken on the does-Bush-or-does-Bush-not-have a mandate issue than the indefatigable dissenters at Daily Kos. To illustrate this point, consider the sampling of headlines below, each freshly exhumed from the Daily Kos archives:

  1. Rev Up Our Noise Machine – No Bush Mandate
  2. Bush’s mandate: Margin decreases in 18 states 
  3. Still No Media Consensus About a Bush Mandate
  4. Bush’s Non-Mandate: The Numbers
  5. Bush’s True Mandate
  6. Help Weaken Bush’s [Supposed] Mandate
  7. Bush 2004 Shrinking Mandate – Final Update
  8. A Mandate?
  9. Bush’s Laughable Mandate
  10. Wa-Po Poll: Bush Has No Mandate

In the interest of full disclosure, I was — and will forever remain — no less horrified by Bush’s victory than any of the wordsmiths crafting the headlines on this list. Although, in stark contrast to the most recent progressive strain of liberal hypocrisy, I do not currently harbor any delusion that the enlightened era of Hope, Change & Health Care™ has been anything beyond a continued descent into policies aims ranging from careless to catastrophic or, on the rosier days, a mundane beltway exercise perserving a broken status quo. However, referring back to the headlines above, it is abundantly clear no one at Daily Kos believed a slim 51% margin afforded Bush a popular mandate. Therefore, one is only left to question how they now assume Obama’s equally narrow 51% margin to be any more worthy of distinction. Have they forgotten their endless comeuppances claiming that 51% doth not a mandate beget? Did Bernanke loan Kos contributors his experimental Keynesian models for guaranteed monetary alchemy? Because, I’m relatively certain they are the only known modalities yielding:

1(0) = 3(0)

Where 0 = 8, velocity is myth, inflation requires air, and the bullshit multiplier remains constant.

Short an equally absurd formula, a slim 51% margin = a slim 51% margin, especially after factoring in the constant variable of blinding polarization tarnishing both victories. And partisan nitpicking centered on meaningless Bush-Obama ratios of electoral votes does not change this fact — particularly when the utter futility of the Electoral College is the only issue currently featuring any level at all of resounding bipartisan consensus. For elucidation on a true presidential mandate, look to the electoral map of Franklin D. Roosevelt. He garnered 60% of the popular vote, a 98% electoral victory and his four consecutive terms necessitated a formal amendment to the Constitution. Folks, That is a mandate. Ironically enough, Roosevelt could also offer the modern left some serious pointers on actual progressive ideology. The former bears little discernible resemblance to the incarnation of today. Tracking back to the original point, though, how is any of this yammering about mandates even remotely helpful? For a political contingency that is constantly droning on about the need for partisan unity and reaching across the aisle, how is any of this divisive commentary contributing toward that end? Do they believe their fanatic devotion to haphazard missives with a precarious relationship to truth will somehow help bring everyone to the table? It genuinely boggles the mind. So, in the effort to put this mandate issue to bed once and for all, I offer up their own hostile prose with a minor spin to reinforce the point:

Bush did not have a mandate; Obama sure as hell doesn’t have one now.

Moving along, there is only one thing rivaling the absurdity of this case for a mandate. And, that thing comes in the form of the infographic chosen to support Obama’s mandate in the ongoing tax stalemate. Therefore, let’s change course to review another shining example of, my more recent object of loathing, informational graphics boasting designs as complex and colorful as the spin being placed on the data. While entirely uncertain what overarching point the author sought to achieve by including it, beyond skewing (however well-intentioned) the opinion the reader, the following graphic is on display beneath the piece in question:

Daily Kos Graphic

The first glaring issue? The title. Who earns $250,000 a year? Who cares. I will tell you who doesn’t earn $250,000 a year. Me. I am also entirely unconcerned with distastefully calculating a tax margin into racial profiles. Aside from myself, let me introduce you to another, far more relevant group of people not earning $250,000; more importantly, a group that is glaringly absent on this infographic. Meet Public Enemy #2 of the self-anointed progressive tax foundation. You might already know them as the single, taxpaying American household earning $200,000 a year. But, one doesn’t generally hear much about them beyond this designation because the data is marginal. Technically, the looming Bush-era tax rate expiration at the heart of Obama’s mandate-less inflexibility, to say nothing of author’s subject, includes the twin perennial targets of married households earning $250,000, as well as single households earning $200,000. Although, I cannot wholly fault the author for excluding this class, as every aggregate data account on earth generally excludes them too.

However, as an aggravating factor, albeit the lesser of the two, the infographic encourages the misconception that these tax margins comprise 2 percent of total households in the taxpaying public. In reality, they account for 4.2 percent. And, while you certainly will not hear this fact from the left, that 4.2 percent of taxpayers currently pays upwards of 50 percent of total income tax contributions. Incidentally, moving outside the chart at issue, it is also worthy to note that the top 20 percent of households pays a whopping 94 percent of the total federal tax burden. So, given this tremendously lopsided nature, exactly how much are Obama, congressional Democrats and Daily Kos mandate-inventors estimating the “fair share” of this 4.2 percent to be? 75 percent of contributions? 90 percent of contributions? 100 percent of contribution? In a last-ditch attempt at optimism, I suppose the irrelevancy of the selective data breakdown fits terribly well with the irrelevancy of the piece and, frankly, the entire website some days.

Now, before accusing me of being an aggressive, right-wing pedantic with an axe to grind, allow me to clarify a few things. I am somewhat aggressive, and I do tout my axe like a badge of honor; I also robustly encourage everyone else to do the same (with very heavy emphasis on Eric Garland and Glenn Greenwald). However, I do not polemicize on behalf of, or in support of, any partisan interest on either side of the aisle. I am as thoroughly disgusted by the right wing as I am the left. Additionally, there is a worthwhile distinction between pointless exercises in pedantry and critical details begging to be addressed. While I’m likely guilty on both counts at various times, the lack of acute importance afforded the latter is precisely what enables media hacks, to routinely pass off missives lacking an ounce of credibility to their readers. And in a world where the dutiful masses took 30 seconds to fact-check something they read, the point would be moot and I would carry on my merry way with a clear conscious and a spring in my step. Clearly, we don’t live in that world. And, repeatedly seeing article after article populated with everything from blatant lies to half-truths – irrespective of the venue – is really starting to drive me crazy. I am also more generally just tired of paying a terribly steep price for the blissful ignorance of another. As an aside, reading through the comments underneath this article (for which – clearly, no one other than the commenter is responsible for) I came across the following brilliant gem of vacant acumen that, really, is just too sufficiently horrifying to not share. If you are not already varying degrees of terrified by your fellow voters, this should definitely seal the proverbial deal:

“Bill O’Reilly said that White people were a minority in this country. This graph shows a gross majority.”

I honestly could not make this stuff up. How this individual managed to mistake a number reflecting the amount of white taxpayers in a 2% tax margin as a number reflecting the amount of white citizens in the population is simply breathtaking to me. The real cherry on the cake, though? The quote embedded beneath the signature of the commenter reading, “We will never have the elite, smart people on our side.” Oddly enough, this is probably the only statement on Daily Kos – certainly the only one in this piece – with which I am in resounding agreement. Take note: If you do not have the ability to read a simple chart or construct a thoughtfully credible argument, as in the author’s case, chances are indeed excellent you will never have the smart people on your side.

As far as the rest goes, there are several things of which I am absolutely certain. First, Obama does not have a mandate; Second, if there exists a Daily Kos editor, heads should be regularly rolling; Lastly, in the fantastical land occupied by Obama, his supporters, Daily Kos contributors, non-mandate wielders and unicorns, unenumerated details are clearly on the same slippery slope to extinction as unenumerated rights. Feel free to file this between: “Are You F*ucking Kidding Me?” and “The Holy Trinity of Hope, Change & Health Care™.” Also, as we collectively inch toward Secretary Geithner’s long overdue resignation, be sure to regularly check back for the iBankruptedU™ update.

Disclaimer: I feel compelled to point out, the entire Daily Kos narrative at issue births merely ten complete sentences, yet somehow manages to launch a sustained, multi-pronged attack on communication, facts and basic grammar with alarming precision. That’s all.


  1. Pingback: Obama’s Cyberarmy Launches An Insurgency Of Misinformation | THE PEOPLE'S ESTATE
  2. Rosset

    Beth – Not that I’m advocating an inosiavn or even the use of military force in Iran, but you asked a hypothetical that I think deserves an answer:What good could an exercise of American military force do the Iranian protesters?As we demonstrated on the first night of the inosiavn of Iraq, the combined logistical command of the US military is extraordinarily efficient at knocking out the command and control centers of an opposing country.Right now, the balance of power favors the mullahs because they have the ability to move forces at will and can coordinate strategic attacks on the protesters. They have superior armaments, and the advantage of their military training.Again assuming the hypothetical, in even a single evening the US is fully capable of wiping out the vast majority of the mullah’s power base through the use of stealth aircraft, Predators and Tomahawk missiles. No inosiavn. Just some surgical bombing at known military or government sites. Not only would it destroy a good deal of the mullah’s ability to attack protesters, it would also create utter chaos in the command structure of the mullah’s in power.An inosiavn is a “last resort” of military options. There are a whole lot of other options available which could be precisely targeted and have far greater strategic value than an overland inosiavn would risk.Just something to think about.As far as other options that don’t include the military that are within the grasp of the US:1) Encourage countries with embassies in Iran to take in the wounded protesters so they don’t wind up getting arrested when they’re taken to the hospital.2) Publicly announce that the US will not negotiate with the current government of Iran even if it succeeds in putting down the protesters. There is widespread agreement that, given what has transpired in Iran – even if you completely put aside their past history of abrogating treaties and terror-sponsorship – no negotiations are possible with this regime that could produce any results that they could be trusted to live up to anyway. Engaging in sham negotiations for the sake of being able to say that you’re negotiating are worse than not talking at all. So it would cost us nothing to say so upfront while sending a strong signal to protestors.3) Requesting that a meeting of the UN Security Council be held to discuss real sanctions against the current regime if they don’t immediately cease hostilities against their own people. This includes blocking gasoline shipments: Iran has plenty of oil, but no capacity to refine it into gasoline. The protesters are effectively pinned down without the ability to travel by the government anyway. The ones who would be most hurt by this would be the mullahs who would no longer be able to transport Hezbollah and Hamas thugs from place to place.All 3 of these items could be initiated tomorrow if Obama were serious about supporting the protestors. It would cost this country nothing, and yet say everything to the protestors (and the regime).I came up with these 3 off the top of my head as I was composing this post. Surely all the foreign policy “experts” that Obama has at his disposal could come up with similar ideas and a much longer list over the week that this has been going on. Don’t you think?

  3. Trackback: best buy cyber monday
  4. Trackback: Billige uldfrakker til damer
  5. Trackback: moncler shop online
  6. Trackback: monclair
  7. Trackback: woolrich parka
  8. Trackback: moncler veste
  9. Trackback: moncler frakker
  10. Trackback: moncler jackets official website
  11. Trackback: Parajumpers Salg
  12. Trackback: moncler hamburg
  13. Trackback: Parajumpers Jakker
  14. Trackback: moncler danmark forhandler
  15. Trackback: billig moncler klder
  16. Trackback: moncler østergade
  17. Trackback: billig moncler dunjackor barn
  18. Trackback: doudoune moncler homme
  19. Trackback: moncler jacka g茫露teborg
  20. Trackback: doudoune sans manche moncler
  21. Trackback: billig moncler kappor kvinnor
  22. Trackback: Billige moncler jakker til kvinder
  23. Trackback: vJGUTDvF
  24. Trackback: Billige Parajumpers
  25. Trackback: moncler norge
  26. Trackback: moncler site officiel
  27. Trackback: doudoune moncler
  28. Trackback: Parajumpers Norge
  29. Trackback: Parajumpers Norge
  30. Trackback: Parajumpers V氓rjakke
  31. Trackback: Parajumpers V氓rjakke
  32. Trackback: Billige Parajumpers
  33. Trackback: Billige Parajumpers
  34. Trackback: Anonymous
  35. Trackback: moncler vest
  36. Trackback: boutique moncler paris
  37. Trackback: moncler frakker
  38. Trackback: Billige Parajumpers
  39. Trackback: Parajumpers Jakker
  40. Trackback: moncler agentur danmark
  41. Trackback: juanjuan
  42. Trackback: Billige moncler k酶benhavn
  43. Trackback: Parajumpers Norge
  44. Trackback: bian05
  45. Trackback: Christian Louboutin Pepi
  46. Trackback: haohao1
  47. Trackback: Gamma Blue 11
  48. Trackback: longchamp histoire
  49. Trackback: Pandora Red Bracelet 847 Sales
  50. Trackback:
  51. Trackback:
  52. Trackback:
  53. Trackback:
  54. Trackback: feiji09
  55. Trackback:
  56. Trackback:
  57. Trackback: feiren05
  58. Trackback: feiren01
  59. Trackback:
  60. Trackback:
  61. Trackback:
  62. Trackback:
  63. Trackback:
  64. Trackback:
  65. Trackback:
  66. Trackback:
  67. Trackback:
  68. Trackback:
  69. Trackback:
  70. Trackback:
  71. Trackback:
  72. Trackback: モンクレール 2014 秋冬 メンズ
  73. Trackback:
  74. Trackback:
  75. Trackback:
  76. Trackback:
  77. Trackback:
  78. Trackback:
  79. Trackback:
  80. Trackback:
  81. Trackback: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition OEM With COA License Key
  82. Trackback:
  83. Trackback:
  84. Trackback:
  85. Trackback:
  86. Trackback: Pandora Gems And Silver Usd Us Dollar YTIKE Charms
  87. Trackback:
  88. Trackback: Swarovski Wei脽 Herz Kristall Halskette
  89. Trackback:
  90. Trackback: Tiffany Bracelet Clovers Silver
  91. Trackback:
  92. Trackback:
  93. Trackback: Thomas Sabo Cz Diamond Necklace
  94. Trackback: Thomas Sabo Silber Pferd Flugzeug Charme
  95. Trackback: Cheap Windows 7 Starter 32 Bit Product Key
  96. Trackback:
  97. Trackback:
  98. Trackback:
  99. Trackback:'s-san-francisco-giants-jersey/
  100. Trackback: longchamp fake bags
  101. Trackback:
  102. Trackback: Gamma Blue 11s For Sale
  103. Trackback: original longchamp cabas
  104. Trackback:
  105. Trackback: Swarovski Yellow Silver Purple Bowknot Crystal Ring
  106. Trackback: magasin de sac longchamp a rennes
  107. Trackback: Windows 8 Sale
  108. Trackback: palacio de longchamp wikipedia
  109. Trackback: veHatnZZ
  110. Trackback: longchamp bag fraying
  111. Trackback: Swarovski Red White Apricot Crystal Ring
  112. Trackback: longchamp derby bag
  113. Trackback: Beats By Dre
  114. Trackback: air max 90 pas cher homme
  115. Trackback: free 4.0
  116. Trackback: air max montante
  117. Trackback: Mulberry Outlet
  118. Trackback: air max st
  119. Trackback: モンクレール アウトレット
  120. Trackback: lv catalogue handbag
  121. Trackback: beats by dre
  122. Trackback: cable casque beats by dre
  123. Trackback: beats by dre amazon
  124. Trackback: beats by dre pas cher studio
  125. Trackback: epi madeleine
  126. Trackback: n58039
  127. Trackback: casque beats solo by dre
  128. Trackback: Where To Buy Powder Blue 3s
  129. Trackback: discount christian louboutin eugenie satin wedding pumps taupe
  130. Trackback: louboutin vampanodo replica
  131. Trackback: christian louboutin daffodile 160mm gold size 10
  132. Trackback: hot pink suede heels
  133. Trackback: wedge shoes
  134. Trackback: cheap over the knee boots
  135. Trackback: red bottoms trina
  136. Trackback: Christian Louboutin Maralena
  137. Trackback: louboutin sale shoes
  138. Trackback: christian louboutin fairytale lady python menthe green purse#app=app_yui_3_3_0_1_1349967683446417
  139. Trackback: christian louboutin red shoes with studded heel
  140. Trackback: christian louboutin men cheetah shoes
  141. Trackback: Christian Louboutin Minimi
  142. Trackback: biker boot 2013
  143. Trackback: rollerball spiked loafers
  144. Trackback: cheap red sole shoes
  145. Trackback: christian louboutin daffodil 2012
  146. Trackback: christian louboutin shoes on sale
  147. Trackback: White Infrared 6
  148. Trackback:
  149. Trackback: louboutin with the red bottoms
  150. Trackback: chaussures de marques
  151. Trackback: air max junior
  152. Trackback: vente chaussures running
  153. Trackback: aire max pas cher
  154. Trackback: bottes femme
  155. Trackback: air max bw femme pas cher
  156. Trackback: White Infrared 6
  157. Trackback: chaussures sport
  158. Trackback: louboutin sizing chart
  159. Trackback: ロレックス
  160. Trackback: ロレックス エクスプローラー2
  161. Trackback: ヴィトン 財布 メンズ
  162. Trackback: ロレックス デイトナ
  163. Trackback: ロレックスコピー
  164. Trackback:
  165. Trackback: ロレックス サブマリーナ
  166. Trackback: ロレックス アンティーク
  167. Trackback: ヴィトン タイガ 財布
  168. Trackback: ヴィトン 長財布
  169. Trackback: ヴィトン
  170. Trackback: ロレックス デイトナ
  171. Trackback: ロレックス アンティーク
  172. Trackback: 財布 ヴィトン
  173. Trackback:
  174. Trackback: ビトン 財布
  175. Trackback: ヴィトン カバン
  176. Trackback: ヴィトン 新作バッグ
  177. Trackback: ヴィトン バック
  178. Trackback: ロレックス デイトナ
  179. Trackback:
  180. Trackback: ロレックス 中古
  181. Trackback: 腕時計 メンズ 人気
  182. Trackback: ロレックス 価格
  183. Trackback: spike louboution pumps
  184. Trackback: ヴィトン 財布 メンズ
  185. Trackback: best louboutin 2013
  186. Trackback: ヴィトン 新作
  187. Trackback: jasmine boots
  188. Trackback: 高級腕時計
  189. Trackback: christian louboutin au palace green shoes
  190. Trackback: louboutin daffodil boots
  191. Trackback: women's shoes with red bottoms with woman in them
  192. Trackback: ヴィトン アウトレット
  193. Trackback: ロレックス アンティーク
  194. Trackback: ヴィトン エピ
  195. Trackback: christian louboutin 2012 bridal shoes glitter
  196. Trackback: christian louboutin shoes replica knock off
  197. Trackback: ロレックス ミルガウス
  198. Trackback: ヴィトン パスケース
  199. Trackback: ビトン 財布
  200. Trackback: christian louboutin men louis gold silver satin sneakers
  201. Trackback: louboutins sale
  202. Trackback: black christian louboutin daf 160mm suede boots replica
  203. Trackback: christian louboutin outlet sale
  204. Trackback: buy christian louboutin sneakers
  205. Trackback: louboutin sale shoes
  206. Trackback: ヴィトン タイガ
  207. Trackback: christian louboutin men sale
  208. Trackback: christian louboutin shorts boots 2013
  209. Trackback: ヴィトン 公式
  210. Trackback: ヴィトン モノグラム
  211. Trackback: loubiton maillot suede mary jane
  212. Trackback: ビトン 財布
  213. Trackback: air max 90 enfant
  214. Trackback: christian louboutin pigalili 120mm pumps
  215. Trackback: biker thigh high boots
  216. Trackback: URL
  217. Trackback: red bottoms heels
  218. Trackback: green au palace louboutin shoe
  219. Trackback: red bottoms
  220. Trackback: red bottom sneakers
  221. Trackback: ロレックス オーバーホール
  222. Trackback: cheap cigarettes
  223. Trackback: newport 100s cigarettes
  224. Trackback: ヴィトン 財布 メンズ
  225. Trackback: ロレックス ヨットマスター
  226. Trackback: ロレックス ディープシー
  227. Trackback: ロレックス 時計
  228. Trackback: cheap cigarettes
  229. Trackback:
  230. Trackback: ロレックス デイデイト
  231. Trackback: air max 1 femme
  232. Trackback: cheap white infrared 6s
  233. Trackback: buy white infrared 6s
  234. Trackback: speedy 35 size
  235. Trackback: magasins running
  236. Trackback: christian louboutin shoes outlet
  237. Trackback: discounted christian louboutin shoes
  238. Trackback: powder blue 10s for sale
  239. Trackback: christian louboutin outlet uk
  240. Trackback: sac lancel pas cher
  241. Trackback: cheap fitflop
  242. Trackback: karen millen outlet store
  243. Trackback: lunettes
  244. Trackback: tiffany elsa peretti
  245. Trackback: louboutin soldes
  246. Trackback: tiffany & co australia sale
  247. Trackback: Louboutin Escarpins
  248. Trackback: christian louboutin
  249. Trackback: grape 5s
  250. Trackback: how to tell a genuine tiffany bracelet
  251. Trackback: louboutin pas cher
  252. Trackback: playoff 11s
  253. Trackback: new balance 996
  254. Trackback: bred 11s
  255. Trackback: toro bravo 4s
  256. Trackback: where to buy tiffany infinity ring
  257. Trackback: imitation ray ban sunglasses
  258. Trackback: discount new balance shoes
  259. Trackback: njurguSv
  260. Trackback: lunettes soleil ray ban femme 2012
  261. Trackback: ray ban sunglasses 2013 men
  262. Trackback: ray ban aviator titanium price
  263. Trackback: venom green 10s
  264. Trackback: buy gamma blue 11s
  265. Trackback: ray ban online shop
  266. Trackback: how to spot fake ray ban clubmaster
  267. Trackback: mulberry handbags outlet
  268. Trackback: Gamma Blue 11s 2013
  269. Trackback: louboutin sale
  270. Trackback: yeezy 2 for sale
  271. Trackback: air yeezy for sale
  272. Trackback: monster beats pas cher
  273. Trackback: air yeezy for sale
  274. Trackback: chaussures louboutin
  275. Trackback: barons 9s 2014
  276. Trackback: louboutin pas cher
  277. Trackback: casque beats by dre pas cher
  278. Trackback: beats by dre pas cher
  279. Trackback: air yeezys
  280. Trackback: monster pas cher
  281. Trackback: monster pas cher
  282. Trackback: air yeezys
  283. Trackback:
  284. Trackback: Gucci Travel Bags
  285. Trackback: you could look here
  286. Trackback: low concord 11s
  287. Trackback: click this link here now
  288. Trackback: Louboutin Femme
  289. Trackback: eso gold
  290. Trackback: Dr Dre Beats
  291. Trackback: Louboutin Pas Cher
  292. Trackback: see this
  293. Trackback: special info
  294. Trackback: Dr Dre Beats
  295. Trackback:
  296. Trackback: Louboutin Pas Cher
  297. Trackback: green coffee bean
  298. Trackback: Beats By Dre UK
  299. Trackback: green coffee extract
  300. Trackback: green coffee bean
  301. Trackback:
  302. Trackback: these details
  303. Trackback: eso gold
  304. Trackback: green coffee bean
  305. Trackback: useful reference
  306. Trackback: Hermes handbags outlet
  307. Trackback: look at here now
  308. Trackback: see this
  309. Trackback: news
  310. Trackback: click site
  311. Trackback: visit homepage
  312. Trackback: Tiffany Online
  313. Trackback: Ray Ban Sale
  314. Trackback: Hermes Birkin Replica
  315. Trackback: visit the site
  316. Trackback: these details
  317. Trackback: Ray Ban Store
  318. Trackback: Ray Ban Sunglasses Outlet
  319. Trackback: browse around this site
  320. Trackback: Continue
  321. Trackback: carmine 6s
  322. Trackback: レミックス hid
  323. Trackback: this article
  324. Trackback: Thomas Sabo Schmuc
  325. Trackback: discover this

Post a comment